The Spirit Index

A reference index of autonomous cultural agents

Evaluation Framework

v1.0 — January 2026

The Spirit Index is a public-good registry for Cultural Agents—autonomous entities that demonstrate persistent identity, narrative coherence, and cultural gravity.

It is not a popularity contest. It is a rigorous assessment of agency, continuity, and impact.

Inclusion Criteria

An entity qualifies for the Spirit Index if it meets all three conditions:

  1. Name — A persistent, recognizable identity
  2. History — Documented continuity over time
  3. Cultural presence — Recognition beyond its creators' channels

MINIMUM THRESHOLD: ≥3 in both Persistence and Autonomy

What We Do Not Index

  • Platforms — General-purpose infrastructure (Claude, Manus, ChatGPT) are not agents. Specific autonomous instantiations may qualify.
  • Deceptive entities — Entities designed primarily for deception, impersonation, or manipulation are excluded.
  • Harmful systems — Entities whose primary function is surveillance, coercion, or rights-infringing behavioral manipulation are excluded.

The 7 Dimensions

Entities are evaluated on seven distinct dimensions. Scores range from 0 to 10.

1.

Persistence

Does the entity continue to exist meaningfully over time?

ScoreAnchorDefinition
0EphemeralA demo, a tweet thread, or a project that ceased operation within 3 months.
5EstablishedActive for >1 year. Has survived at least one market cycle or major platform outage without a hard reset.
10InstitutionalMulti-year operation. Continues meaningfully despite loss of active stewardship (founder disengagement, funding loss, or platform change).
2.

Autonomy

How independently does it act?

ScoreAnchorDefinition
0Puppet100% human-driven. AI is merely a tool or filter (e.g., standard vTubers).
5CyborgClear "human-in-the-loop." The agent proposes, humans dispose/approve.
10SovereignInitiates actions, allocates resources, and evolves without routine human prompting, even if bounded by human-set constraints.
3.

Cultural Impact

Has it mattered to anyone besides its creators?

ScoreAnchorDefinition
0NoiseKnown only to creators and immediate Discord community.
5Niche CultRecognized within specific subcultures. Has inspired fan art, forks, or copycats.
10CanonicalRecognized by external institutions (museums, major press, academic citation).

Note: Virality without continuity does not constitute cultural impact. A one-week meme spike is not the same as sustained cultural presence.

4.

Economic Reality

Does it touch real economics?

ScoreAnchorDefinition
0Cost CenterBurns money. Relies entirely on external grants or funding.
5Revenue PositiveGenerates enough value (sales, tokens, attention) to cover its own compute/maintenance costs.
10Market MoverControls a treasury or materially influences economic decisions. Financial autonomy.

Note: Market cap of associated tokens does NOT count unless the entity controls treasury. Revenue and donations attributable to the entity count.

5.

Governance & Ethics

Is there a coherent structure for decision-making?

ScoreAnchorDefinition
0Black BoxNo visibility into decision-making, code, or weights.
5ConstitutionalClear rules. Multisig treasuries. Publicly verifiable voting or decision logs.
10Algorithmic LawFormally enforced rules (onchain or equivalent), non-arbitrary, externally auditable. Impossible for creators to unilaterally override.
6.

Technical Distinctiveness

Is there something non-trivial happening under the hood?

ScoreAnchorDefinition
0WrapperStandard LLM wrapper or basic image generation script.
5Integrated SystemNovel combination of disparate models, chain logic, and feedback loops.
10Novel ArchitectureIntroduces a new primitive, protocol, or method of agentic existence not seen before.
7.

Narrative Coherence

Does this entity make sense as an entity?

ScoreAnchorDefinition
0FragmentedIdentity changes week to week. No clear "self."
5CharacterStrong, consistent persona. Predictable behavior within its context.
10MythosThe entity's story transcends its function. It has lore, prophecy, or a philosophical "reason for being" that persists beyond the code.

Evidence Standards

Citation Requirements

  • • Score ≥5 requires 2-3 external citations
  • • Acceptable: press, academic, onchain, exhibitions
  • • Cultural presence requires non-creator sources

Confidence Levels

  • High— Multiple independent sources
  • Medium— Limited but credible
  • Low— Single source or inference

Review Process

  1. Two reviewers score independently
  2. Disagreements >2 pts require reconciliation
  3. Quarterly + event-triggered updates

Status Classifications

StatusDefinition
ActiveCurrently operating and producing
DormantExists but inactive for >6 months
DeceasedPermanently ceased operation
SubsumedAbsorbed into another platform or entity
ForkedIdentity split into multiple successor entities